<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trusting Brevity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/</link>
	<description>Tom Volkar ~ Coaching the leap and the landing to small business success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Bird-Harris &#124; Learning Curve Coaching</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Bird-Harris &#124; Learning Curve Coaching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Brevity for the sake of brevity? Nope. No can do.

Brevity as a result of using the exact word to convey the exact thought or message? A goal I continually aspire to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brevity for the sake of brevity? Nope. No can do.</p>
<p>Brevity as a result of using the exact word to convey the exact thought or message? A goal I continually aspire to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slade &#124; Shift Your Spirits</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Slade &#124; Shift Your Spirits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Tom,

If I had to pick one writing goal that I continually aspire toward it&#039;s being more &quot;succinct.&quot; I especially appreciate brevity in the online environment. 

I must admit that I still have a long way to go to get to Brevity. 
:-)

Slade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>If I had to pick one writing goal that I continually aspire toward it&#8217;s being more &#8220;succinct.&#8221; I especially appreciate brevity in the online environment. </p>
<p>I must admit that I still have a long way to go to get to Brevity.<br />
 <img src='http://www.delightfulwork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Slade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-756</guid>
		<description>All - thank you for giving me many things to consider.

For those of you who haven&#039;t already seen Six Word Memoirs, you&#039;ll enjoy: http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/

I find the Hemingway story on that page fascinating because of its impact.  At the same time I wonder: how many people died?  Nobody?  The baby?  The mother giving birth?  The expecting parents?  I apologize for being morbid, but it seems like that six-word story could be the beginning of so many different Lifetime Channel movies.

Seems to me that brevity only leads to clarity with sufficient shared context.  I didn&#039;t understand that Tom was referring to writing instead of conversation, so I replied here.  My ex and I didn&#039;t understand where each other&#039;s emails were coming from (e.g., how much disgust versus how much love were in them) so we&#039;re exes.  And if I may presume: Tom wasn&#039;t familiar with the context of Chuang Tzu/Zhuangzi&#039;s work, so Fawn&#039;s quotation appeared unclear.

(Amazing how dead guys from China can change their name ;-)

Peter - for many years, my mother nagged me that the authors of &quot;DOS for Dummies&quot; and &quot;PCs for Dummies&quot; made millions in royalties in spite of the manuals that came with the computer for free.  People - including my parents - didn&#039;t buy the books because they were wordy; they bought them because they felt understood by the authors, and learned more that way.  Please consider that understanding your audience (&quot;shared context&quot;) and writing for them may be more important than length.

Oh yeah - Mom stopped nagging me when she figured out that I was one of those geeks who preferred manuals to &quot;Dummies&quot; computer books.  De gustibus non est disputandum?  Guess I prefer brevity for some things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All &#8211; thank you for giving me many things to consider.</p>
<p>For those of you who haven&#8217;t already seen Six Word Memoirs, you&#8217;ll enjoy: <a href="http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/</a></p>
<p>I find the Hemingway story on that page fascinating because of its impact.  At the same time I wonder: how many people died?  Nobody?  The baby?  The mother giving birth?  The expecting parents?  I apologize for being morbid, but it seems like that six-word story could be the beginning of so many different Lifetime Channel movies.</p>
<p>Seems to me that brevity only leads to clarity with sufficient shared context.  I didn&#8217;t understand that Tom was referring to writing instead of conversation, so I replied here.  My ex and I didn&#8217;t understand where each other&#8217;s emails were coming from (e.g., how much disgust versus how much love were in them) so we&#8217;re exes.  And if I may presume: Tom wasn&#8217;t familiar with the context of Chuang Tzu/Zhuangzi&#8217;s work, so Fawn&#8217;s quotation appeared unclear.</p>
<p>(Amazing how dead guys from China can change their name <img src='http://www.delightfulwork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Peter &#8211; for many years, my mother nagged me that the authors of &#8220;DOS for Dummies&#8221; and &#8220;PCs for Dummies&#8221; made millions in royalties in spite of the manuals that came with the computer for free.  People &#8211; including my parents &#8211; didn&#8217;t buy the books because they were wordy; they bought them because they felt understood by the authors, and learned more that way.  Please consider that understanding your audience (&#8220;shared context&#8221;) and writing for them may be more important than length.</p>
<p>Oh yeah &#8211; Mom stopped nagging me when she figured out that I was one of those geeks who preferred manuals to &#8220;Dummies&#8221; computer books.  De gustibus non est disputandum?  Guess I prefer brevity for some things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Volkar</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Volkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Andrea now you know why I&#039;m the brevity guy. :)

Peter I agree with your assessment on the value of your books. If the writing is concise and I trust the content I appreciate
brevity because it gets to the point quickly.

Robin cute. :)

Laurie don&#039;t get me started on common sense and traditional education. Understanding where these practices originate is a challenge.

Barbara here here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea now you know why I&#8217;m the brevity guy. <img src='http://www.delightfulwork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Peter I agree with your assessment on the value of your books. If the writing is concise and I trust the content I appreciate<br />
brevity because it gets to the point quickly.</p>
<p>Robin cute. <img src='http://www.delightfulwork.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Laurie don&#8217;t get me started on common sense and traditional education. Understanding where these practices originate is a challenge.</p>
<p>Barbara here here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Swafford</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Swafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom, 

Yes, less is more.

Barbara Swaffords last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloggingwithoutablog/DWWZ/~3/357083780/&quot;&gt;Interview With Lorelle VanFossen - Part 8 - The Future of Blogging&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom, </p>
<p>Yes, less is more.</p>
<p>Barbara Swaffords last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloggingwithoutablog/DWWZ/~3/357083780/">Interview With Lorelle VanFossen &#8211; Part 8 &#8211; The Future of Blogging</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-746</guid>
		<description>I never understood why teachers require a certain number of pages for a paper.  If the depth of understanding can be conveyed with fewer words, why not accept a paper less then 8 pages.  What happens is students fatten up their papers to stretch it out without adding any quality.  

@ Robin- very nice.  :O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood why teachers require a certain number of pages for a paper.  If the depth of understanding can be conveyed with fewer words, why not accept a paper less then 8 pages.  What happens is students fatten up their papers to stretch it out without adding any quality.  </p>
<p>@ Robin- very nice.  :O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Yes

Robins last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://letsliveforever.net/2008/08/this-blogging-life/&quot;&gt;This Blogging Life!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes</p>
<p>Robins last blog post..<a href="http://letsliveforever.net/2008/08/this-blogging-life/">This Blogging Life!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ayers</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-743</guid>
		<description>“I didn&#039;t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.” 
              - Mark Twain 

Brevity is an art and few of us take the time to perfect it.

We tend to value books by their length rather than their impact. So much of what&#039;s communitated is more time-consuming than valuable.

I am currently writing two books and I feel the pressure to lengthen them. After consideing your article I will focus on shortening them. One is only 16 pages and perhaps long enough.  I think I&#039;ll charge extra for the all the time that brevity will save the reader!

Cheers,

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I didn&#8217;t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.”<br />
              &#8211; Mark Twain </p>
<p>Brevity is an art and few of us take the time to perfect it.</p>
<p>We tend to value books by their length rather than their impact. So much of what&#8217;s communitated is more time-consuming than valuable.</p>
<p>I am currently writing two books and I feel the pressure to lengthen them. After consideing your article I will focus on shortening them. One is only 16 pages and perhaps long enough.  I think I&#8217;ll charge extra for the all the time that brevity will save the reader!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Volkar</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Volkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Hi Monika you are pretty darn good at trimming that fat. I&#039;ve read your stuff. Bravo!

Fawn brevity leads to clarity. Sorry I must be dense today. I&#039;m sure Mr. Tzu is a profound philosopher but I&#039;m not getting it and I read it five times. Perhaps he needed another line to communicate?

Clem a reply is unnecessary except to say thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Monika you are pretty darn good at trimming that fat. I&#8217;ve read your stuff. Bravo!</p>
<p>Fawn brevity leads to clarity. Sorry I must be dense today. I&#8217;m sure Mr. Tzu is a profound philosopher but I&#8217;m not getting it and I read it five times. Perhaps he needed another line to communicate?</p>
<p>Clem a reply is unnecessary except to say thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clem Gigliotti Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.delightfulwork.com/getting-unstuck/trusting-brevity/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Clem Gigliotti Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delightfulwork.com/?p=104#comment-740</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Less is more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

